Capital Punishment †Is the Death Penalty Effective Essay Sample free essay sample

The decease punishment is non an effectual manner to forestall or cut down offense. It risks the lives of guiltless people and costs much more than a life sentence. The emotional urge for retaliation is non a sufficient justification for raising a system of capital penalty. with all its accompanying jobs and hazards. The overpowering decision from old ages of disincentive surveies is that the decease punishment is no more of a hindrance than a sentence of life in prison. Harmonizing to World Wide Web. deathpenalty. org. in the US. provinces without the decease punishment have had systematically lower slaying rates. Scientific surveies have continually failed to show that executings deter people from perpetrating offense any more than long prison sentences. The South histories for 80 % of US executings and has the highest regional slaying rate. Research reported in Homicide Studies. Vol. 1. No. 2. May 1997. indicates that executings may really increase the figure of slayings. We will write a custom essay sample on Capital Punishment – Is the Death Penalty Effective? Essay Sample or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page instead than deter slayings. Many people favor the decease punishment as reparation for the incorrect done to a victim’s household ; nevertheless. in most instances. closing is non the consequence. This isn’t justness in the traditional sense. but requital. Encouraging our basest motivations of retaliation. which ends in another violent death. extends the concatenation of force. Leting executings countenances killing as a signifier of ‘pay-back. ’ Although our first inherent aptitude may be to bring down immediate hurting on person who wrongs us. the criterions of a mature society demand a more mensural response. Assorted people who are opposed to the decease punishment say that capital penalty condemns the inexperienced person to decease. Harmonizing to Amendment V in the United States Bill of Rights. â€Å"No individual shall be held to reply for a capital offense. or otherwise ill-famed offense unless on a notification of an indictment of a expansive jury† . While it is true that a few guiltless people have â€Å"slipped through the cracks† of the justness system and have been convicted and executed below the belt. it is highly rare that thi s type of state of affairs would go on. By the clip that all entreaties are exhausted. it is most likely that the lawyers will happen new grounds to back up alleged criminal’s artlessness from analyzing the instance so many times. The decease punishment is much more expensive than life without word because the Constitution requires a long and complex judicial procedure for capital instances. If the decease punishment was replaced with a sentence of Life Without the Possibility of Parole. which costs 1000000s less and besides ensures that the populace is protected while extinguishing the hazard of an irreversible error. the money saved could be spent on plans that really better the communities in which we live. The 1000000s of dollars in nest eggs could be spent on: instruction. roads. constabulary officers and public safety plans. after-school plans. drug and intoxicant intervention. kid abuse bar plans. mental wellness services. and services for offense victims and their households. The lone true fact about the utility of a decease punishment is the fact that many people feel that killing convicted liquidators will fulfill their demand for justness and/or retribution. Even though some people feel relieved when the liquidator is executed. there is no manner to change by reversal the offense ( s ) that he has committed. It comes down to whether we should maintain a system for the interest of requital or avenge even though it isn’t effectual in cut downing violent offense. costs much more than options and. worst of all. can take to the executing of person for a offense he didn’t commit.

How to Petition the Government Online

How to Petition the Government Online Got a gripe with the government? Exercise your rights. Congress is prohibited from restricting the right of American citizens to petition the government under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, adopted in 1791. â€Å"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.† - The First Amendment, United States Constitution. The authors of the amendment surely had no idea just how easy it would become to petition the government in the age of the Internet more than 200 years later. President Barack Obama, whose White House was the first to use social media such as Twitter and Facebook, launched the first online tool allowing citizens to petition the government through the White House website in 2011. The program, called We the People, allows users to create and sign petitions on any topic. When he announced the program in September 2011, President Obama said, â€Å"When I ran for this office, I pledged to make government more open and accountable to its citizens. Thats what the new We the People feature on WhiteHouse.gov is all about - giving Americans a direct line to the White House on the issues and concerns that matter most to them.† The Obama White House often portrayed itself as one of the most transparent to the public in modern history. Obamas first executive order, for example, directed the Obama White House to shed more light on presidential records. Obama, however, eventually came under fire for operating behind closed doors. We the People Petitions Under President Trump When Republican President Donald Trump took over the White House in 2017, the future of the We the People online petition system looked doubtful. On January 20, 2017 - Inauguration Day - the Trump administration deactivated all existing petitions on the We the People website. While new petitions could be created, signatures to them were not being counted. While the website was later fixed and is currently fully functional, the Trump administration has not responded to any of the petitions. Under the Obama administration’s control, any petition that collected 100,000 signatures within 30 days was to receive an official response. Petitions that gathered 5,000 signatures would be sent to the â€Å"appropriate policymakers.†Ã‚   The Obama White House said any official response would be not only by emailed to all petition-signers but posted on its website as well.   While the 100,000 signature requirement and White House response promises remain the same under the Trump administration, as of November 7, 2017, the administration had not officially responded to any of the 13 petitions that had reached the 100,000 signature goal, nor has it stated that it  intends to respond in the future. How to Petition the Government Online No matter the White House’s response to them, if any, the We the People tool allows Americans over the age of 13 to create and sign petitions on www.whitehouse.gov asking the Trump administration to take action on a range of important issues facing our country. All that is required is a valid email address. People who wish to create a petition are required to create a free Whitehouse.gov account. To sign an existing petition, users need only enter their name and their email address. For identity verification, they will receive an email with a web link that they must click to confirm their signature. A Whitehouse.gov account is not needed to sign petitions. The We the People website calls creating or signing a petition as â€Å"just the first step,† suggesting that concerned citizens build support for a petition and gather even more signatures. â€Å"Use email, Facebook, Twitter and word of mouth to tell your friends, family and coworkers about the petitions you care about, the White House states. As was the case under the Obama administration, petitions involving ongoing criminal investigations or criminal justice court proceedings in the United States and certain other internal processes of the federal government are not subject to petitions created on the We the People website. What It Means to Petition the Government The right of Americans to petition the government is guaranteed under the Constitutions First Amendment. The Obama administration, acknowledging the importance of the right, said: Throughout our nations history, petitions have served as a way for Americans to organize around issues that matter to them, and tell their representatives in government where they stand. Petitions played important roles, for example, in ending slavery and guaranteeing women the right to vote. Other Ways to Petition the Government Though the Obama administration was the first to allow Americans to petition the government through an official U.S. government website, other countries had already allowed such activities online. The United Kingdom, for example, operates a similar system called e-petitions. That countrys system requires citizens to collect at least 100,000 signatures on their petition on their online petitions before they can be debated in the House of Commons. The major political parties in the United States also allow Internet users to submit suggestions that are directed to members of Congress. There are also many privately run website that allow Americans to sign petitions that are then forwarded to members of the House of Representatives and Senate. Of course, Americans can still write letters to their representatives in Congress, send them email or meet with them face-to-face. Updated by Robert Longley

Managing projects Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words - 1

Managing projects - Essay Example 1). It involves how to be able to successfully carry out a task up to the end of its schedule set up by the project manager or client. It is managing an activity which can be about a project at work, school or home. Managing projects can be a deciding factor in the success of an organisation. In a manufacturing plant, production of goods cannot be successfully carried out without project management. Operations management deals with decision-making related to productive processes to ensure that the resulting products are produced according to specifications. In the field of education, project management is designing learning experiences that link practice and theory (Miller, 1991, cited in Falkenberg et al., 2000, p. 745). This essay deals with situations and guidelines for the success of a project by the project manager and his team. All projects involve a manager and a team who must work hand in hand up to its success. Managing projects is one of the most challenging tasks in organisations today. Since earlier times, people undertook projects as organised human activity. Early humans in primitive days conducted hunting activity as a means of searching and providing food for the community. This activity was conducted with a plan and a process. As civilizations began and progressed, projects became wider and complicated in scope; they involved more sophisticated machinery and complicated processes. Some of the big projects that we can recall are the Great Wall of China, the Great Canals, Suez and Panama, and other big projects involving buildings, structures, and bridges in the different parts of the world. (Frame, 2003, p. 1) In the 1900s, rapid industrialisation and demands of munitions production in World War I saw the emergence of management scientists and industrial engineers such as Elton Mayo and Frederick Winslow Taylor who studied people and productivity in factories. Henry Ford made production-line manufacture famous with his Model T